https://www.journals.elsevier.com/political-geography
Wednesday, August 29, 2018
Wednesday, August 8, 2018
Global Labor Migration: Past & Present
Global Labor Migration: Past and Present
Labor migration is a vast,
global, and highly fluid phenomenon in the 21st century, capturing
public attention and driving political controversy. There are more
labor migrants working in areas beyond their birth country or region
than ever before. Although scattered across the social ladder, migrant
workers have always clustered, at least initially, in the bottom rungs
of the working class. Even as cross-border or inter-regional movement
may beckon as a source of hope and new opportunity, the experience for
the migrants and their families is often fraught with peril. Labor
migrants are vulnerable: they are exploited more easily by recruiters
and employers, and are less likely to benefit from union
representation. They often face arrest or deportation when attempting
to fight for their rights, and are bound to special documents that limit
their ability to change jobs. Moreover, as recent history reminds us,
host-country fears directed towards labor migrants can also spark larger
political movements characterized by nativist, racist, or even outright
fascist tendencies. Clearly, there is a need to combat fear with
understanding and to reach for improved global regulations and standards
to protect the rights and welfare of migrants alongside those of host
country working people.
Because today global labor
migration is shaping the lives of millions, and because it is receiving
unprecedented attention by scholars, the newly-formed Global Labor
Migration Network (GLMN) is currently planning for a Global Labor
Migration Summit to take place in Amsterdam in summer 2019. Involving
scholars and activists from diverse parts of the globe and drawing on a
wide variety of disciplines–including history, sociology, anthropology,
ethnic studies, women and gender studies, public health, law and public
policy–this project will bring international attention to one of the
world’s most pressing issues, generate scholarly dialogue and new
research agendas, and propose policies that can improve conditions for
migrants. The conference will also include a range of presentation
formats: brief papers, roundtables, and open conversations.
Our keynote speakers for the
conference have been announced! They are Donna Gabaccia of the
University of Toronto and Bridget Anderson of the University of Bristol.
Wednesday, July 5, 2017
Writing & Running -- New Project
I just read an article on writing and its benefits. This reminded me of all those times that I wanted to put my thoughts on paper; especially, thoughts and ideas that came to me while running. All the ideas that come to me while running my long runs seem brilliant, creative, and unique. By the time I come home, however, I have already moved on to another mode and ideas remain unwritten.
The article I read urges writers not to use long sentences and big words, to make clear statements, avoid the abstract, and practice writing in this way every day for six months. This will be like training for the marathon I ran for the first time in my life in April 2017 in Vienna. I had also started training for the marathon some 4 months before.
Throughout my long runs that lasted for some 2, 3, and 4 hours as part of my training, I thought of writing a book entitled "The Memoirs of a First Time 68-Year-Old Marathon Runner." I even planned the chapters but April came and I ran the Vienna Marathon in 5.5 hours and the book was not written.
Practice
It seems that practice is the key to writing and also to running marathons. I think the first time I read about the importance of practice in writing is when I read Haruki Murakami's memoir, in which he writes about his interest and participation in long-distance running. He talks about the importance of discipline and practice in writing,emphasizing that creativity does not just come to him. He writes about his strict schedule every day.
There is something soothing about schedules; especially, when there is a goal ahead. Schedules are an anti-dote for indecisiveness and they give a meaning to your day.
The article I read urges writers not to use long sentences and big words, to make clear statements, avoid the abstract, and practice writing in this way every day for six months. This will be like training for the marathon I ran for the first time in my life in April 2017 in Vienna. I had also started training for the marathon some 4 months before.
Throughout my long runs that lasted for some 2, 3, and 4 hours as part of my training, I thought of writing a book entitled "The Memoirs of a First Time 68-Year-Old Marathon Runner." I even planned the chapters but April came and I ran the Vienna Marathon in 5.5 hours and the book was not written.
Practice
It seems that practice is the key to writing and also to running marathons. I think the first time I read about the importance of practice in writing is when I read Haruki Murakami's memoir, in which he writes about his interest and participation in long-distance running. He talks about the importance of discipline and practice in writing,emphasizing that creativity does not just come to him. He writes about his strict schedule every day.
There is something soothing about schedules; especially, when there is a goal ahead. Schedules are an anti-dote for indecisiveness and they give a meaning to your day.
Monday, December 19, 2016
Role of Education in Resolving the Refugee Crisis in EU
Role
of Education in Resolving Refugee Crisis in EU
"An
investment in knowledge pays the best interest"[1]
Abstract
The
long-term integration of the refugees in Europe will be one of the central
tasks facing the EU in the coming years. In this regard, the question is to
what extent education can bring solutions to the integration of refugees in
their host countries and enabling them to find employment. Within this
framework, under what conditions can the EU resolve its refugees crisis. This paper will explore whether education
assumes a key role in equipping the refugees with the tools to succeed—either
in their host country or, in the case of return, eventually back in their home
country. In addition, this work will also explore whether education is also a
key vehicle to transmit host country values and provide orientation on civic
life. The main point of this study will be to show that education can go a long
way in resolving the refugee crisis in the EU and I wish for this study to pave
the path to a better understanding of the challenges faced by the refugees and
how they can be helped.
Introduction
The arrival in Europe of more than 1 million refugees in 2015 unsettled
the EU like no crisis before it.[2]
This sharp increase in refugee flow
prompted EU member states to adopt two responses: One was to strengthen EU
internal and external borders so as to prevent refugees making their way into Europe[3]
and the second was to
try and prevent
refugees and migrants
making the Mediterranean crossing
by restricting the activities of people traffickers. I will focus on the first response only. As a growing number of EU countries moved to
seal their borders and increasingly resorted to individual actions such as
imposing border controls or building fences along their frontiers, big fault
lines opened up across the European Union member states; in this way, endangering
the European economic and social cohesion.
Under what conditions can the EU resolve the refugee
crisis and curb the rising hostility toward the refugees is a question that has
been on my mind for some time. The
motive for this work is to explore whether education, which is an investment in
human capital, can pave the path to social peace and the integration of the immigrants
on the one hand, and restore trust among the member states deeply divided over illegal
immigration, on the other. The question
is – how should the EU respond to this challenge? To this question, I
tentatively try to explain that the best approach for the EU is to invest in
human capital and continue on its declared path.
My work is divided into three parts: Part I introduces the reader to a brief
overview of the refugee crisis and the measures the EU has taken to resolve this
crisis. Part II explains the importance
of human capital and education with regard to both the refugees and the host
population. Finally, I proceed with a
discussion and tentative proposal suggesting that the EU should focus on
changing course with regard the policies on illegal immigration and invest in
education.
I actually have only one purpose and one bias in this
paper: My purpose is to introduce the
reader to the importance of education in changing the prevalent mind-set of viewing
the refugees as a threat to the existing social structure and values and my
bias is suggesting that a trial-and-error system is preferable to the present security
approach. To sum it up, I will try to
show that education, not only assumes a key role in equipping both the refugees
and the host population with a means to adjust to the new reality but it may
even be the only means to ensure economic and human growth.
Refugee Crisis
I had a number of reasons for undertaking this
study. It stroke me as noteworthy that the
literature on the refugee crisis focused mainly on keeping refugees out and
that the EU member states were mostly concerned
with security; in particular, border security.
Efforts to contain the flow had unexpected and unwelcome consequences,
creating hitherto unknown risks with the potential to cross borders, beyond the
ability of a single country to manage the crisis. Unforeseen consequences such as the potential
of a disintegrating EU and rise of extreme right-wing politics came about. Populist parties translated pervading public
concerns over the refugees into "legitimate" enemies -- the enemy
becoming "legitimate" as it is held responsible for public concerns[4] such as taking jobs away from
the citizens and competition over work dragging down wages. Furthermore,
the framing of the refugee reality by the state actors as an act of benevolence
and tolerance also shaped the public opinion in a way that led to the exposure
of more racist and xenophobic attitudes vis-a-vis the refugees, marginalizing
them even more.
All the amount of literature, research, and proof of the
possibility of a positive contribution of the refugee flow fell on deaf
ears. Many economists and scholars note that
in view of the low birthrates in the majority of EU countries, a large number
of immigrants will be needed to preserve the potential for economic growth and
ensure the long-term financing of European welfare systems; in this way,
reversing the upward creep of the cost of state pensions. Furthermore, even though in the very short
run, the IMF estimates that refugees will add around 0.19% of Gross Domestic Product
to public expenditure in the EU, later on, as the new arrivals integrate into
the workforce, they are expected to boost annual output by 0.1% for the EU as a
whole[5] .
European nations share the assumption that the way to
address the refugee crisis is through border security and, therefore, have made
mass investments in advanced border controls.
The EU focuses on investing in tools and means allowing for limiting/blocking
access to Europe (border patrols), shifting the problem to someone
else (sending money to other countries instead of taking in refugees
permanently), or getting rid of the problem (by helping with
deportations).
Oxford University Professor Ruben Andersson shows, in his
paper, that even though European attempts to secure or protect the borders have
clearly failed, more of the same is being done in response to the escalating refugee
crisis. He further explains that focus
on border security indicates a failure to see the "migration crisis" as
a global crisis of the twenty-first century, which plays out not only at
European borders but also in many of Europe’s neighboring countries and the
developing world. Focus on border
security implies that the influx of refugees represents a temporary threat to
Europe that can be eliminated; in other words, this is a short-term external
'risk'.[6] "Most recommendations on how to manage
the migrant crisis are security-based," he says, stressing that "the
striving for ‘security’ tends to produce ‘insecurity’ ad infinitum," and
suggesting that "a different systemic approach" is needed to replace
the current security model." [7] Nevertheless, over and over again the EU continues
to adopt a tough stance toward illegal immigration with politicians insisting
and recommending solutions to "manage"[8] the influx instead of
admitting that the "The Refugee Crisis Is Here To Stay[9],"
and that the security-approach is
counterproductive, urgently in need of a shift.
Human
Capital
It is widely assumed that
education plays a vital role in successful integration. The United Nations Human Development
Report 2015: Work for Human Development, stresses the importance of
education in human development, emphasizing that human development encompasses
development in several dimensions of human well being, social development one of its important dimensions. Education is
also one of the most important means to improve personal endowments, build
capabilities, overcome constraints and in the process, enlarge available set of
opportunities and choices for a sustained improvement in well-being. The
process of education and attainments thereof has an impact on all aspects of
life. It is a critical invasive instrument for bringing about social, economic
and political inclusion of people[10].
Only recently, however, the importance of education in the
integration of refugees in Europe has become topical.[11]
The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHRW) 2013 report entitled
"A New Beginning: Refugee Integration in Europe," has only two
references to education. The first one
is in the Table of Contents and the other that "there is little
refugee-specific literature on education and integration in France, but some
studies report on refugees and language."[12] A joint
paper released by the UN Refugee Agency and the Global Education Monitoring
Report in 2016, however, is entitled "No more excuses: Provide education
to all forcibly displaced people" calling "for countries and their
humanitarian and development partners to urgently ensure that internally
displaced, asylum seeking and refugee children and youth are included in
national education plans."[13] Obviously, the task of integrating large
numbers of migrants and refugees in the EU challenges educational systems and
concepts; but the report emphasizes the importance of the EU investing in its
people for the long-term goal of shared and inclusive growth. I would like to draw attention here that
since 2000, the deportation of illegal immigrants cost at least 11.3 billion
Euro to the 28 EU member states.[14]
Furthermore, there is some evidence that immigrants, who
have obtained their education in host-country schooling, have higher odds of
being employed than other non-educated immigrants. The same study shows that
the benefits of host-country schooling are related to an increasing number of
ties to … natives and to an overwhelming degree of increasing
productivity."[15]
One of the main challenges facing refugees trying to integrate in their host country
is finding a suitable job. If the EU
recognizes this issue, it can invest in the education of the refugees; in this
way, investing in refugee integration. [16]
In my opinion, in our increasingly
interdependent world, importance should be attached not only to education but to
future education. I will now proceed to explain
what I mean by future education for the purpose of this paper. As the demands on education have become
increasingly complex today, it becomes essential to determine the needs of the
future, and evolve a system of education that equips youth to face the
challenges that the 21st century will
bring.[17] What is important to keep in
mind in this approach is that the future for which we are educating the youth
does not yet exist and to a large extent is unknown or unknowable. For this reason, we may not be able to
anticipate the precise nature of the future, but we can provide an education
based on the understanding that it will be very different from the present.
In the "Future Education
Symposium[18]"
held in 2015, it was noted that education as it is widely practiced around the
world today, still largely functions according to an old system and fosters
passive submission and obedience to authority at a time when the world needs
individuals with the self-reliance, initiative, and problem-solving
capabilities to fashion new solutions rather than merely regurgitate old
ones. Traditional education still
emphasizes getting the 'right' answers to questions. It prepares youth for
increasingly scarce salaried jobs rather than imparting the capacity to create
new jobs through self-employment and entrepreneurship.
Education is our best hope for a better future but education
should be much more than learning and passing of information. Various scholars have underscored the
importance of a shift from overemphasis on information to creative thinking and
spiritual values in education.[19]
As stated in an article entitled "Overcoming the Educational Time
Warp," the "knowledge and skills society needs in the 21st century are those that nurture the
mental, emotional, and social development of individuals who know how to live and
interact with other people, to lead and collaborate with others, to understand
themselves and empathize with others.[20]"
For this reason, both the European youth
and the refugees should be prepared to "confront uncertainty[21]". The current refugee crisis in Europe shows
that an issue can have its origins in one part of the world, and its effects
seen in another distant part of the world.
Being concerned with a narrow cause, ignoring the larger picture and imagining
that anything can be contained are ideas education has to work on to eliminate
in youth.
In her book entitled Learning Futures – Education,
technology and social change, Professor Keri Facer suggests that education
should create the future instead of preparing the youth for or against a future
we have already imagined. Furthermore, education
needs to create the conditions that will enable students to assume societal
leadership and responsibility, confront uncertainty, nurture the capacity for
democracy and debate, build solidarity, and participate in the dynamic creation
of possibilities.[22]
Discussion/Conclusions
"All life is problem solving" says Karl Popper in
his book and recommends that the memorization of important material by
repetition be replaced with a problem-oriented approach and that "error
correction is the most important method in learning"[23]. In this regard, insistence on outmoded
approaches under new conditions may generate intractable problems for the
European Union. One of the main tenets
of Popper's philosophy is that progress is achieved "if and only if, we
are prepared to learn from our mistakes: to recognize our errors, and to
utilize them critically instead of persevering in them dogmatically." Since this approach upholds the view that
there can be no progress without mistakes and that each and every decision we
make may give rise to undesirable consequences, admitting to an error is
necessary in order for the EU to proceed and achieve progress. In this regard, the EU has obviously failed
to resolve the refugee crisis by focusing only on the border security
approach. I, therefore, suggest that the
EU turn its attention from the security approach to the educational
approach. I also suggest that, along
these lines, the EU identify the changes needed in the present education system
and determine a course of action to meet the challenge of a graduate shift to
"Learning to Live Together," which was determined as one of the four
pillars of learning by UNESCO.[24] In other words, education as a tool
for equipping young
people, our future
generation of leaders,
with the knowledge,
skills and attitudes
to tackle prejudice
and hostility and
to build more
peaceful, tolerant and equitable societies.
The refugee crisis is unlikely to be a one-off phenomenon.
Given the tensions in Europe’s wider neighborhood, refugee flows to the EU
might well become the "new normal" over the coming years. While this
can become an opportunity for aging Europe, it is time to prepare for the
"new normal". I suggest,
therefore, that the EU take a risk and invest in the education of both the
refugees and the local population to adjust to the "new normal."
Bibliography
Andersson,
Ruben (2016) "Europe’s failed ‘fight’ against irregular migration:
Ethnographic notes on a counterproductive industry," Journal of Ethnic and
Migration Studies 42(7):1055-1075.
Andersson,
Ruben (2016), "Hardwiring the frontier? The politics of security
technology in Europe’s 'fight against illegal migration'" Security
Dialogue 47(1):22-39.
Andersson,
Ruben (2016) "Why Europe’s border security approach has failed – and how
to change it." Policy paper for the LSE/Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Berlin
report on human security.
Frattini,
Franco (2007) "The future of EU migration and integration policy."
Public Lecture at London School of Economics, 23 February 2007.
Harish,
Janani (2015), "Report on Future Education Symposium"; The Wealth of
Nations Revisited, CADMUS, New Perspectives on Major Global Issues.
Jacobs,
Gary (2015) "Overcoming the Educational Time Warp: Anticipating a
Different Future," CADMUS, New Perspectives on Major Global Issues, Vol.
2, Issue 5.
Kaldor,
Mary (2016) From Hybrid Peace to Human Security: Rethinking EU Strategy towards
Conflict," The Berlin Report of the Human Security Study Group, Presented
to High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs & Security Policy
Federica Mogherini.
Morrice,
Linda (2007) " Lifelong learning and the social integration of refugees in
the UK: the significance of social capital," International Journal of
Lifelong Education, Volume 26, Issue 2.
Popper,
Karl (1966), The Open Society and Its Enemies: Volume 1: The Spell of Plato,
Princeton University Press, Fifth Edition (revised), UK.
Popper,
Karl (2004), Poverty of Historicism, (Routledge, Taylor & Francis, London
& New York).
Europe’s
failed ‘fight’ against irregular migration: Ethnographic notes on a
counterproductive industry (2016). Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
42(7):1055-1075.
Rinaldi,
David (2016). "A New Start for
Social Europe," Notre Europe, Jacques Delors Institute. http://www.institutdelors.eu/media/newstartsocialeurope-rinaldi-jdi-feb16.pdf?pdf=ok
Tubergen,
van Frank & Agnieszka Kanas (2009)
"The Impact of Origin and Host Country Schooling on the Economic
Performance of Immigrants" Social Forces, Volume 88, Number 2, pp. 893-915
(Article)
[1] Benjamin Franklin
[2]
European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm
[3] UNHCR
-- Hungary is building a fence (along its border with Serbia). Spain has done
the same (in Ceuta and Melilla). Bulgaria followed suit (on the border with
Turkey). More fencing is springing up in Calais. In Macedonia, which is not in
the EU, they are deploying armored vehicles against migrants.
[4] Karen
Umansky (2015) " The Quest for a "Legitimate" Enemy:
Contemplations on Electoral Behavior of Populist Parties in Europe - Evidence
from Austria, the Netherlands and the UK" Council for European Studies
Conference."
[5] The Refugee Surge in Europe: Economic
Challenges, January 2016.
www.imf.org/external/pubs/
[6] Ruben
Andersson (2016) Europe's failed ‘fight ’ against irregular migration:
ethnographic notes on a counterproductive industry, Journal of Ethnic and
Migration Studies, 42:7, 1055-1075, DOI:
10.1080/1369183X.2016.1139446
[7] Ruben
Andersson, ‘Why Europe’s Border Security Approach Has Failed – and How to
Replace It’, SiT/WP/08/16, February 2016, London.
[8]
"Managing the Refugee Crisis" http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/publications/managing-refugee-crisis-state-play-presentation-european-council-15-october-2015_en
[9] Rena
Dourou, " The Refugee Crisis Is Here To Stay. Now Is The Time To Deepen
European Cooperation," The Huffington Post, 4 October 2016.
[10]
Human Development Report 2015: Work for Human Development. http://report.hdr.undp.org/
[11]
Christian Bodewig, Education is the key to integrating refugees in Europe
[12] http://www.unhcr.org/protection/operations/52403d389/new-beginning-refugee-integration-europe.html
[13]
Global Education Monitoring Report, http://en.unesco.org/gem-report/no-more-excuses#sthash.z2QSHwgd.dpbs
[14] http://migrantreport.org/the-money-trails/
[15] Agnieszka
Kanas and Frank van Tubergen, "The Impact of Origin and Host Country
Schooling on the Economic Performance of Immigrants," Social Forces,
Volume 88, Number 2, December 2009, pp. 893-915.
[16]
According to the 2016 European Semester: Country Specific Recommendation /
Council Recommendation - Germany, the high influx of refugees experienced in
the past year has a number of social and economic consequences for Germany.
While in the short run, the inflow of refugees is set to increase public
expenditure and to create additional domestic demand, thereby raising GDP, the
medium-term effect on employment and growth hinges on refugees' successful
labor market and social integration, including via educational support. This
issue is high on the political agenda both at the EU and Member State level and
will be monitored and analyzed closely, including in the 2017 country report.
[17]
Janani Harish, Report on Future Education Symposium, 13 October 2015; The
Wealth of Nations Revisited, CADMUS, New Perspectives on Major Global Issues.
[18]
Dubrovnik, September 21-23, 2015, Inter-University Centre, Dubrovnik, Croatia
[19]
"The World Academy of Art Science" http://www.worldacademy.org/conference/transformative-future-education
[20] Gary
Jacobs (2015) "Overcoming the Educational Time Warp: Anticipating a
Different Future," CADMUS, New Perspectives on Major Global Issues, Vol.
2, Issue 5 (October 1015)
[21] Keri
Facer, "Learning Futures, Education, Technology, and Social Change," Routledge,
Taylor & Francis Group, London & New York, 2011, P. 80-88.
[22] Keri
Facer
[23] Karl
Popper, "All Life Is Problem Solving," Routledge, Taylor &
Francis Group, London & New York, 1999, P. 100.
[23]
Keri Facer
[24] ://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002272/227208e.pdf
Friday, October 7, 2016
Liminality
Liminality
A new and exciting word, which, in my opinion perfectly describes personal, social, and political transitions.
In anthropology, liminality (from the Latin word līmen, meaning "a threshold") is the quality of ambiguity or disorientation that occurs in the middle stage of rituals, when participants no longer hold their pre-ritual status but have not yet begun the transition to the status they will hold when the ritual is complete. During a ritual's liminal stage, participants "stand at the threshold"between their previous way of structuring their identity, time, or community, and a new way, which the ritual establishes.
A new and exciting word, which, in my opinion perfectly describes personal, social, and political transitions.
In anthropology, liminality (from the Latin word līmen, meaning "a threshold") is the quality of ambiguity or disorientation that occurs in the middle stage of rituals, when participants no longer hold their pre-ritual status but have not yet begun the transition to the status they will hold when the ritual is complete. During a ritual's liminal stage, participants "stand at the threshold"between their previous way of structuring their identity, time, or community, and a new way, which the ritual establishes.
Wednesday, August 31, 2016
Old France New France
Old France New FranceAugust 2016We had a wonderful week visiting Provence tasting its delights, savoring views, and having a glimpse of this refined culture. The house in itself was full of surprises, little corners, stairs leading to the roof, and a whole range of photos and albums of the owners. The kitchen was a world of its own, with a variety of olive oils, salts, and dishes. The best part of the day for me was the mornings -- the extended breakfast pleasure and lively conversation after my morning run. Initially, I only ran from one village to another, sometimes having a 'noisette' with locals before running back to the house. Almost all my questions for directions back to the house from where I was ended with "courage madame" from the locals. This always made me feel a little triumphant returning home safe and sound after battling the outside world!!!
I did have the impression of a déjà-vu in Provence, it almost seemed as though I was in a movie. Some things even looked familiar. It was the France and the French I was brought up to admire and appreciate -- the courtesy, style, and impeccable gout.
And then we went to Marseille!!! And that is when I realized that Provence was actually the Old France and that Marseille is the New France. It was vibrant, dynamic, and volatile! I sort of felt at home as it was more like the Middle East I know. Everything looked like the Old France -- the architecture, the Cathedral, and the Old City -- but the people were of all races, colors, and dresses. It was exciting and alive! Could it be that I felt more at home? Perhaps... It was a sort of Paris in the Mideast!I saw couples -- white and black hands walking hand-in-hand; I saw Burkini-clad women walking hand-in-hand with modern-clad young men; I saw diversity, flash of colors, and heterogeneity. And, for some reason that gave me hope for the future.It may not be the refined France and French we know but it seems to be the future and from the way we were treated with patience, kindness and an extremely helpful attitude from the young locals all the way on the "dangerous" road to the St Charles Gare, I would say that perhaps Marseille offers a new perspective on how a multicultural city can exist and even thrive.
I am including a link to the "Je Suis Chez Moi" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsOqEhMumaw song we heard countless times that tells it all. Tina
Sunday, November 27, 2011
Etienne BALIBAR
Introduction
These new reflections on the issue of "transnational citizenship" and its aporias, which I have the possibility to submit for discussion owing to the generous invitation of the Institute on Globalization and the Human Condition at McMaster University, will be presented from a European point of view, as I have done in previous essays on the same subject. But I will try to do so also in the perspective of a comparison, or better said, a confrontation, with North America, of which you are part, and where I have been working now regularly for years, albeit across the border.
I do not believe in the possibility of speaking about "the global" from a point of view itself "global" — that is, from nowhere or everywhere. But I believe in the (relative) possibility of dis-locating one's point of view, one's place of enunciation, and above all of exposing oneself to the dis-location that comes from others.
What I am offering here has no pretension to present a full doctrine of "transnational citizenship," no more than it was the case before, but I will try to clarify certain issues and to take into account some discussions that have developed over the last few years (in particular after the publication of important essays by our Italian colleagues Alessandro Dal Lago and Sandro Mezzadra),which themselves were prompted by rapid transformations of the status of borders, the policies of "territorial defence" against illegal migrants, and the rise of "populist" ideologies and parties throughout Europe.
All this, indeed, comes in the wake of the growing polarization of world politics after 9/11, and therefore is not unrelated to similar tendencies observable internationally.
My contention is that we are observing a growing confusion of the historical and political categories of the "stranger" and the "enemy," which in a sense only brings to the fore a tendency inherent in the structure of the nation-state, and periodically activated by situations of cold or hot war, but also "normally" limited in its expression by laws and customs, which now seems to become irresistible —as was the case in some tragic moments of the past century. But the scale is not the same, and the resulting political alternatives cannot be the same either.
If the name "auto-immunity crisis," which has been proposed by the philosopher Jacques Derrida in some of his last essays (2005), is a good guiding thread, it would not be only a political question of choosing between fascism and democracy (and repelling one in the name and the perspective of the restoration of the other in its full comprehension), but more radically a meta-political or "constitutional" question of accepting a regression of the universalistic notion of citizenship, or inventing, against the current, a new historical
advance of that notion.
I feel indeed that we are only in the preliminary inquiries for achieving such a progress.
These new reflections on the issue of "transnational citizenship" and its aporias, which I have the possibility to submit for discussion owing to the generous invitation of the Institute on Globalization and the Human Condition at McMaster University, will be presented from a European point of view, as I have done in previous essays on the same subject. But I will try to do so also in the perspective of a comparison, or better said, a confrontation, with North America, of which you are part, and where I have been working now regularly for years, albeit across the border.
I do not believe in the possibility of speaking about "the global" from a point of view itself "global" — that is, from nowhere or everywhere. But I believe in the (relative) possibility of dis-locating one's point of view, one's place of enunciation, and above all of exposing oneself to the dis-location that comes from others.
What I am offering here has no pretension to present a full doctrine of "transnational citizenship," no more than it was the case before, but I will try to clarify certain issues and to take into account some discussions that have developed over the last few years (in particular after the publication of important essays by our Italian colleagues Alessandro Dal Lago and Sandro Mezzadra),which themselves were prompted by rapid transformations of the status of borders, the policies of "territorial defence" against illegal migrants, and the rise of "populist" ideologies and parties throughout Europe.
All this, indeed, comes in the wake of the growing polarization of world politics after 9/11, and therefore is not unrelated to similar tendencies observable internationally.
My contention is that we are observing a growing confusion of the historical and political categories of the "stranger" and the "enemy," which in a sense only brings to the fore a tendency inherent in the structure of the nation-state, and periodically activated by situations of cold or hot war, but also "normally" limited in its expression by laws and customs, which now seems to become irresistible —as was the case in some tragic moments of the past century. But the scale is not the same, and the resulting political alternatives cannot be the same either.
If the name "auto-immunity crisis," which has been proposed by the philosopher Jacques Derrida in some of his last essays (2005), is a good guiding thread, it would not be only a political question of choosing between fascism and democracy (and repelling one in the name and the perspective of the restoration of the other in its full comprehension), but more radically a meta-political or "constitutional" question of accepting a regression of the universalistic notion of citizenship, or inventing, against the current, a new historical
advance of that notion.
I feel indeed that we are only in the preliminary inquiries for achieving such a progress.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
